According to Professor Kishor Wasan, there are four forms of leadership, each with its own set of features and consequences. The authors of The Four Types of Leadership discuss the issue of opposing values in leadership as well. While there is no official definition of these four forms of leadership, they all exhibit a set of traits that are required for successful leadership. Each kind is described below. You may choose whichever one best describes your situation. Some of the distinctions between these techniques are listed below.
Task-oriented leadership focuses on developing step-by-step solutions, meeting deadlines, and finishing tasks. It is most effective when utilized to guide managers, directors, and individual contributors. However, it is not always the right strategy in all situations. If feasible, employ collaborative leadership techniques while leading people. This style is appropriate for managers, directors, and senior executives. It is not the greatest strategy for all forms of leadership, but it may be effective when you need to be more adaptable.
The ability to make decisions is an essential component of any leadership style. Each employee will be granted varying amounts of decision-making power depending on the job at hand. The work at hand, the individual's function, and their emotional development all influence whether or not they are granted the appropriate degree of power. In general, instructing others what to do is not considered leadership. It serves more as a management tool. The more your understanding of someone's emotional maturity and experience, the more successful they may be in your leadership style.
The capacity to adjust to changing conditions is one of the most crucial abilities of a leader. This implies you must strike a balance between the several approaches that are most suited to the scenario at hand. A task-oriented leader is sometimes the best option, while a relationship-oriented leader is sometimes the greatest option. In any case, it's critical to choose the appropriate style for the occasion. You'll be able to adjust to diverse circumstances this way.
Professor Kishor Wasan pointed out that the four forms of leadership are also described differently. The Oxford Strategic Leadership Program, for example, established neo-emergent leadership theory, which characterizes leadership as an impression generated by the leader and others in the business. It entails, as the name implies, the replication of information and its outcome. It is not leadership if someone tells you what to do. The same may be said for subject-matter specialists.
Almost all academics believe that certain personality attributes make a person a successful leader. Extraversion, intellect, and creativity are among these attributes. Many academics, however, feel that successful leadership emerges over time rather than in an instant. According to Forsyth (2009), leadership attributes are not inherited; they must be coupled with certain talents and motivators. There is no particular "style" of leadership that is best suited to any specific scenario, regardless of which of these three is used.
The two most essential kinds of leadership styles are executive and servant leadership. These two forms of leadership vary in their ability to manage, make choices, and motivate people. The latter two are regarded crucial in a wide range of scenarios, from military battles to company administration. However, the three forms of leadership are not necessarily mutually exclusive, and each has unique strengths and limits. This is the style to adopt if you want a leader that can motivate people to work harder and accomplish the greatest potential results for their firm.
Finally, some individuals practice leadership in their daily lives. These individuals may not possess positions of power or company titles, yet they may display leadership via their behaviors. The capacity to excite and inspire people is essential for successful leadership, regardless of the job a leader does. There are several distinctions between leadership and management, and it is critical to grasp them in order to choose the best one for your situation. It will assist you in reaching your objectives.
In Professor Kishor Wasan’s opinion, authoritarian and democratic leadership styles in business have quite distinct benefits and drawbacks. While the former might be successful in certain contexts, they can also create unpleasant work cultures and set followers against one another. A democratic leader, on the other hand, promotes group engagement while retaining ultimate authority. A democratic leader, on the other hand, develops collective commitment by making followers feel like members of the team. Transformational leaders not only provide a positive example for their followers, but they also inspire others.
